|
|
| academic instructor | K.Kiitsak-Prikk | ||||||||
| |
|||||||||
| graded or pass/fail examinations | E | E | E | ||||||
| term | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||
| ECTS | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | ||||||
| terms | 3 |
| ECTS/total | 12.0 |
|
Aim of the subject:
The aim of the course is to introduce the student to the foundations, processes, and experiences of cultural management as a discipline, both academic and practice-based, and its relations with other fields Content: The course will capture the following themes: Introduction to Cultural Management Cultural Policy Comparative cultural policy Cultural theory and history Cross-Cultural Communication (EBS) Learning outcomes: Upon completing the course, the student will be able to: 1. Be aware of the current themes and developments related to the cultural management field and practice 2. Perceive the overlap and relevant discussions between cultural management and other disciplines; 3. Critically approach and contextualize when needed the practices of cultural managers (including oneself); 4. Display knowledge of the basics of cultural policy and regulations and follow the influence of political processes on the practices and structures related to cultural management; 5. Discuss and potentially contribute to the developments of creative economy (and other relevant economic constructs), local and global strategies 6. Be fluent in current research in cultural management, development of new concepts, and their implication on education and practice Assessment: Active participation and the timely presentation of all homework, both individual and group assignments. Exact forms and timelines are announced during the semester. The module (12 ECTS) can be considered fully completed only if each topic of the module is evaluated positively by the end of the module (3rd semester). Assessment criteria: Excellent (A) The student shows an excellent understanding of the theories and concepts of the module and its various impacts and can apply them to the context of his/her individual project. He/she provides excellent arguments and examples from practical experiences with applying theories and concepts. The student shows excellent skills in their argumentation and thinking. The student shows an excellent holistic understanding of the context of the module, the theories, and the practicalities. Very good (B) The student shows a good understanding of the theories and concepts in the module, and its' various impacts and can apply them to the context of his/her individual project. He/she provides good arguments and examples from practical experiences with applying theories and concepts. The student shows good skills in their argumentation and thinking. The student shows a good holistic understanding of the context of the module, the theories, and the practicalities. Good (C) The student shows an understanding of the theories and concepts of the module, and its various impacts, and the author can apply them to the context of his/her individual project. He/she provides some arguments and examples from practical experiences with applying theories and concepts. The student provides some of their argumentation and thinking. The student shows only a partial understanding of the context of the module, the theories, and the practicalities. Satisfactory (D) The student shows some understanding of the theories and concepts of the module, and various impacts and the author can partially apply them to the context of his/her individual project. He/she provides some arguments and examples from practical experiences with only limited linkages to relevant theories and concepts. The student shows some skills in argumentation and thinking. The student shows only a very partial understanding of the context of the module, the theories, and the practicalities. Sufficient (E) The student shows little understanding of the theories and concepts of the module, and its various impacts and they cannot well apply them to the context of his/her individual project. He/she provides a few arguments and examples from practical experiences without proper linkages to theories and concepts. The author shows little skills in their argumentation and thinking. The student shows a poor understanding of the context of the course, the theories, and the practicalities. Insufficient (0) The student shows no understanding of the theories and concepts of the module, and its various impacts and they cannot apply them to the context of his/her individual project. He/she provides no arguments and examples from practical experiences with linkages to theories and concepts. The author shows no skills in their argumentation and thinking. The student shows a very poor understanding of the context of the course, the theories, and the practicalities. Course reading material: Adorno, T. (1991) Culture and administration in The Culture Industry: Selected Essays on Mass Culture, (Routledge) Brett, J. and Grogan, C.D. 2006. Google and the Government of China: A Case Study in Cross-Cultural Negotiations. Kellogg Business School Case No: 5-406-752 Hurn B.J., Tomalin B. 2013. What is Cross-Cultural Communication? In: Cross-Cultural Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London Hurn B.J., Tomalin B. 2013. Developing Cross-Cultural Communication Skills. In: Cross-Cultural Communication. Palgrave Macmillan, London Kuznetsova-Bogdanovitsh, K. Jyrämä, A. (eds) (2019). Kuidas korraldada kultuuri III. Managing the Arts III. Eesti Muusika-ja Teatriakadeemia Florida, Richard L. (2012) The Rise of the Creative Class, Revisited. New York: Basic Books Pacquette, Jonathan &Redaelli, Eleanora (2015). ArtsManagement and CulturalPolicyResearch. New York: PalgraveMacmillan. Thorsby D. (2001) Economics and culture. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Other materials are given by the instructors in the course of the module. Author of course description: Kaari Kiitsak-Prikk last changed: 2024-04-12 14:41:38 |